Question: Had To VS Should Have?

Could have had meaning?

1: Could have + past participle means that something was possible in the past, or you had the ability to do something in the past, but that you didn’t do it.

(See also modals of ability.) I could have stayed up late, but I decided to go to bed early.

They could have won the race, but they didn’t try hard enough..

How do you use have had in one sentence?

We use have had in the present perfect when the main verb is also “have”:I’m not feeling well. I have had a headache all day.She has had three children in the past five years.We have had some problems with our computer systems recently.He has had two surgeries on his back.

Should have had or should have?

Should had is never grammatically possible. Should is a modal (others are can, could, shall, will, would, must, might). It’s a strict rule that a modal is always followed by the base form of a verb. Should have is used to express regret for a mistake, for not having done something in the past.

Should it have been?

Use “should have been” to express what you think should have happened, but did not happen. Often, you’ll hear this phrase used in arguments or regrets about the past.

Is should have past tense?

Should’ is the past tense of the word ‘shall. ‘ When using the words ‘should have’ you are talking about something in the past that you ‘ought to’ or ‘might have’ done. Here are some examples: “I should have gone with you.”

What is the difference could and could?

Could, would, and should are all used to talk about possible events or situations, but each one tells us something different. Could is used to say that an action or event is possible. Would is used to talk about a possible or imagined situation, and is often used when that possible situation is not going to happen.

Had to VS must have?

The modal verb must has two past tense forms: had to and must have. When expressing obligation, the past of must and have to is always had to: … I had to wash my car yesterday .

Should have should had?

Had is the past tense of have and has, however, we don’t use ‘should has’ even for ‘she’. For example, she would have… (NOT she would has). Thus, always use ‘should have’.

What is difference between have been and had been?

“Had been” is used to mean that something happened in the past and has already ended. “Have been” and “has been” are used to mean that something began in the past and has lasted into the present time.

Is should of grammatically correct?

The phrases “should of,” “would of,” and “could of” are always wrong. Worse. They are viewed as grammatical howlers. In other words, if you write “should of,” “would of,” or “could of” even once, your credibility will take a dive.

Would had been?

Would have been expresses an imaginary situation, talking about something that did not happen, using the present perfect simple tense. This is called a past conditional. It usually talks about an imaginary result followed by the action in the past which would have created that scenario.

Should have had examples?

He should have had this great business. We should have had a couple more. We should have had more faith. “He should have had some professional help”.

Could I have been sentence examples?

Examples: I could have been there on time if I had left home earlier. (= It was possible for me to be there on time, but it didn’t happen.) They could have been married if he hadn’t cheated on her.

Had been meaning?

“Had been” is the past perfect tense and is used in all cases, singular and plural. The past perfect tense refers to something that began in the past and was still true at another time that also was in the past.